Recent posts

#1
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Re: Encryption at rest
Last post by Justin Derrick - July 02, 2025, 01:15:07 PM
Yes.  The snag is that encryption happens at load time -- all new documents will be encrypted, but old documents will remain un-encrypted.  You can reload the documents to force the data to be encrypted at rest.  This also remains true for Globally Unique IDs and Hash values -- only new data will receive the features.

-JD.
#2
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Re: Opentext comparison with C...
Last post by akstrom - July 02, 2025, 06:16:53 AM
OpenText is an archive, BUT : They have not the compress ratio that CMOD have , and the license are expensive. They usually start low, but after 1 year they increase.
I guess OpenText is a more "live archive", CMOD is a cold archive .. you store, search and view. Simple, but effective.
#3
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Encryption at rest
Last post by akstrom - July 02, 2025, 06:12:43 AM
Hi ! Have anyone added encryption at rest on a working environment before ?

BR,
Anne
#4
CMOD for z/OS Server / Re: Recommended Db2 on z/OS Se...
Last post by Ed_Arnold - June 27, 2025, 02:52:51 PM
I learned that new function level is available for Db2.

At this time, there is no plan for CMOD to require any of these new functions.

Db2 13 - What's new - Function level 507 (PH64907 - April 2025)

Function level 507 introduces online conversion of table partitions from PBR to PBG, enhanced concurrency for system temporal tables, LASTUSED support for application plans, more flexibility for temporal and archive-enabled tables, and greater than 64 GB allocation quantities.
#5
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Re: Retrieve all documents fro...
Last post by Justin Derrick - June 20, 2025, 09:58:25 PM
There's a few reasons not to do this...

- The file it generates may be *enormous*, especially if the loaded files were compressed.
- Older versions of CMOD had issues generating generic index files over 2GB in size, rolling over the byte offset back to 0.
- Loading a single large file with data that spans years may break expiration processing, especially if the expiration type is 'Load'.
- Any error retrieving data from CMOD will result in the entire extract failing.
- If there's more than a couple thousand documents, you'll quickly reach a point where your filesystem will be overwhelmed, and simple commands (ls / cp / mv / rm) will take several minutes.

Most folks extract by Load ID or date or by a mostly-unique ID like customer number, etc.

If this is a particularly large job, reach out to me via eMail -- I have a fast & automated extraction utility I use for migrations.

-JD.
#6
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Retrieve all documents from AG
Last post by Michel de Kraker - June 20, 2025, 08:45:18 AM
Goodday all,

Is it possible with the arsdoc get command to retrieve all archived documents from the AG?

I have tried some arsdoc get parameters, but not luck
Any help will be appreciated.

I am using this command:

arsdoc get -a -d /tmp/cmod -f "MSM Consignment Notes" -h archive -i "where CONSIGN_NO='*'" -G D150 -o TEST

Tried also with: CONSIGN_NO='%'

Thankyou

Kind regards ,

Michel
#7
Windows Client / Re: ODF Bug In 10.5.0.9 Admin ...
Last post by Ed_Arnold - June 18, 2025, 02:22:16 PM
As of this writing there is no plan to replace the 10.5.0.9 Admin Client on the download site.

IF your shop is going to be administering ODF

THEN use the 10.5.0.8 Admin Client

OR request a copy of the 10.5.0.9 Admin Client from Level 2 that contains the fix.

Ed
#8
CMOD for Multiplatforms / Opentext comparison with CMOD.
Last post by Michel de Kraker - June 11, 2025, 01:58:16 PM
Hi All,

Does anybody have any knowledge of OpenText? Is this a similar product as CMOD?
Customer of mine want to migrate to OpenText. I would rather stay at CMOD. I need some counter arguments why we should keep CMOD for archiving our documents.

Kind regards,

Michel.
#9
Windows Client / ODF Bug In 10.5.0.9 Admin Clie...
Last post by Ed_Arnold - June 02, 2025, 09:38:32 PM
Don't install the 10.5.0.9 admin client if you're going to use it to administer ODF.

Otherwise, it's fine - just ODF administration has an issue.

I'll append here as I find out more.

Ed
#10
CMOD for z/OS Server / Holds In OAM Are Not Recognize...
Last post by Ed_Arnold - May 14, 2025, 07:18:06 PM
If holds on data are placed in OAM, expiration processing could be an issue.

CMOD does not know about OAM holds.  Unpredictable results may occur including ending up with orphan data objects.

Any holds on CMOD data should be managed from CMOD itself.

The optional feature ERM (Enhanced Retention Management) is the supported solution for managing holds.

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cmofm/10.5.0?topic=ondemand-enhanced-retention-management-erm

Ed