Hi all,
Is arjesd uses any checkpointing ?
We use PSF/Download to send (rarely) heavies outputs (3Go each) from our Z/OS JES2 V 1.11 toward an AIX 5.3.0 & CM/OD 8.3.(7.1.0.3).
All these heavy transferts abort (not the others);
1) just after the error JES2 displays for the PSF printer results like that :
$HASP603 PRT50 UNIT=,STATUS=ACTIVE,(JOB29570 ?tototo06),
$HASP603 138354(350452) PAGES,BURST=NO,CKPTLINE=0,
$HASP603 CKPTMODE=PAGE,CKPTPAGE=100,CKPTSEC=30,
$HASP603 CREATOR=,DEVFCB=,DEVFLASH=****,FCB=****,
$HASP603 FORMS=(STD,,,,,,,),FSS=ARCH2,HONORTRC=YES,
2) After restart of the same prt, we see :
$HASP603 PRT50 UNIT=,STATUS=ACTIVE,(JOB29570 ?tototo06),
$HASP603 350451(350452) PAGES,BURST=NO,CKPTLINE=0,
$HASP603 CKPTMODE=PAGE,CKPTPAGE=100,CKPTSEC=30,
$HASP603 CREATOR=,DEVFCB=,DEVFLASH=****,FCB=****,
$HASP603 FORMS=(STD,,,,,,,),FSS=ARCH2,HONORTRC=YES
So, each restart restarts from First line of the output
On AIX, no file written,even first part, no error recorded (errpt, etc).
How can I see any aix / arsjesd problems in this case, please ?
Bests regards & thanks for advices,
Stephane.
zancanaro - that is a really, really old level of CMOD.
It looks like the following is the problem which was reported against he 7.1.2.3 level:
APAR PK06265 ARSJESD FAILS TO RECEIVE FILES GREATER THEN 2 GIGABYTES
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
Using MVS Download and arsjesd to transfer large files will fail
when the file being transmitted is larger then 2 gigabytes. When
MVS Download is finished transmitting the file, it will send the
final count of bytes sent. Arsjesd will compare MVS Download's
count with its own and fail at this point.
LOCAL FIX:
Break the current 2 gigabyte or greater file into smaller
pieces and transmit through MVS Download and arsjesd. Once on
the OnDemand server, concatenate the files.
Also, customer can FTP files onto the OnDemand server.
My recommendation is to install a current, supported level of CMOD and use that arsjesd.
Ed
Thanks , Ed.
We project to update our jurassic version of CMOD at 3rd quarter of 2013.
We just did the migration of our instances from 7.1.0.3 to a 9 version ( with a db2 in v.9 ;D ) .
A test with same file is OK now.
Thanks Ed.
Stephane.